  | 
            
            
               
                 
                  THE FIELDS 
                  INSTITUTE 
                  FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES | 
               
               
                 
                  
                     
                       
                          2011-2012 
                          Fields Quantitative Finance Seminar  
                          Fields Institute, 222 College St., Toronto  
                       | 
                       
                        Sponsored 
                          by 
                            
                       | 
                     
                   
                 | 
               
             
              
          
  
   
    The Quantitative Finance Seminar has been a centerpiece of the Commercial/Industrial 
    program at the Fields Institute since 1995. Its mandate is to arrange talks 
    on current research in quantitative finance that will be of interest to those 
    who work on the border of industry and academia. Wide participation has been 
    the norm with representation from mathematics, statistics, computer science, 
    economics, econometrics, finance and operations research. Topics have included 
    derivatives valuation, credit risk, insurance and portfolio optimization. 
    Talks occur on the last Wednesday of every month throughout the academic year 
    and start at 5 pm. Each seminar is organized around a single theme with two 
    45-minute talks and a half hour reception. There is no cost to attend these 
    seminars and everyone is welcome. 
    To be informed of speakers and titles for upcoming seminars and financial 
    mathematics activities, please subscribe to the Fields mail 
    list. 
   
  
            
  
            
            
               
                Wed. April 25, 2012 
                  5:00 p.m. 
                  Fields Institute,  
                  Room 230 | 
                 
                   Rogemar 
                    Mamon, University of Western Ontario  
                   
                  A weak hidden Markov chain-modulated model for asset allocation 
                    A discrete-time weak hidden Markov model (WHMM) is proposed 
                    to capture both the switching of economic regimes and memory 
                    property of time series data. The drifts and volatilities 
                    of asset returns switch over time according to the WHMM dynamics. 
                    A multivariate filtering technique in conjunction with the 
                    Expectation-Maximisation algorithm is developed to obtain 
                    estimates of model parameters. An analysis of ``switching" 
                    and "mixed" strategies in asset allocation is presented. 
                    The use of financial signal processing via filtering aids 
                    investors in determining the optimal investment strategy for 
                    the next time step. Numerical implementation is carried out 
                    on the datasets of Russell 3000 value and growth indices. 
                    We benchmark portfolio performances using three classical 
                    investment measures. 
                  Joint work with: 
                    Matt Davison (Departments of Applied Mathematics, Statistical 
                    & Actuarial Sciences, and Richard Ivey School of Business, 
                    UWO) and Jean Xi (Department of Applied Mathematics, UWO) 
                     
                    ====================================  
                    Steve Shreve, Carnegie Mellon University 
                   
                  Optimal Execution in a General One-Sided Limit Order Book 
                    We construct an optimal execution strategy for the purchase 
                    of a large number of shares of a financial asset over a fixed 
                    interval of time. Purchases of the asset have a nonlinear 
                    impact 
                    on price, and this is moderated over time by resilience in 
                    the limit-order book that determines the price. The limit-order 
                    book is permitted to have arbitrary shape. The form of the 
                    optimal execution strategy is to make an initial lump purchase 
                    and then purchase continuously for some period of time during 
                    which the rate of purchase is set to match the order book 
                    resiliency. At the end of this period, another lump purchase 
                    is made, and following that there is again a period of purchasing 
                    continuously at a rate set to match the order book resiliency. 
                    At the end 
                    of this second period, there is a final lump purchase. Any 
                    of the lump purchases could be of size zero. A simple condition 
                    is provided that guarantees that the intermediate lump purchase 
                    is of size zero. This is joint work with Gennady Shaikhet 
                    and Silviu Predoiu. 
                   
                 | 
               
               
                Wed. March 28, 2012 
                  5:00 p.m. 
                  Fields Institute,  
                  Room 230 | 
                 
                   Abel Cadenillas, Mathematics, University of Alberta 
                    A Theory for the Optimal Government Debt Control 
                    Motivated by the current debt crisis in the world, we consider 
                    a government that wants to end the optimal control of its 
                    debt ratio. The debt generates a cost for the country. The 
                    government can reduce the debt ratio, but there is a cost 
                    associated with this reduction. We obtain a solution for the 
                    government debt problem. This is joint work with Ricardo Huaman. 
                     
                    ====================================  
                    **Paul Embrechts, Mathematics, 
                    ETH Zurich 
                    Four Theorems and a Financial Crisis 
                    In this talk I will give my personal assessment of the 
                    financial crisis (crises) and discuss where quantitative risk 
                    management (QRM) went wrong. I will formulate four mathematical 
                    theorems/research areas which have relevance for financial 
                    crises in general. Related to these theorems, key issues to 
                    be discussed are: 
                    1) financial alchemy on Wall street 
                    2) risk measurement for catastrophic risks 
                    3) clustering of extremal events, and 
                    4) beware of linear correlation. 
                     
                    ** Note Tuesday, March 27, 2012  
                    Paul Embrechts, will be speaking at McMaster University 
                    Venue: 15:30 - 16:30 in Hamilton Hall 109, McMaster University 
                    The Financial Crisis as a Crisis of Financial Mathematics? 
                     
                   
                 | 
               
               
                |  
                  
         Wed. March 7, 2012** 
          5:00 p.m. 
          Fields Institute,  
          Room 230 
        Lecture Notes 
                  ***Please note the change in date 
                 | 
                 
                   Alex Levin, Director, Methodology, Market & 
                    Trading Credit Risk, RBC Financial Group 
                     
                    Some Approaches to Modeling Wrong-Way Risk in Counterparty 
                    Credit Risk Management and CVA 
                    Current Risk Management methods focus on Credit Value 
                    Adjustment (CVA) for pricing credit risk of derivative portfolios 
                    and Counterparty Credit Risk (CCR) measurement, and are especially 
                    concerned with issues related to modeling Wrong-Way Risk (WWR) 
                    - dangerous positive correlation between the exposure to a 
                    counterparty and its default probability. In this talk, we 
                    will explore several new Counterparty Credit Risk measures 
                    that account well for Wrong-Way Risk and Right-Way Risk. I 
                    will then introduce a multifactor "Gaussian - jump of 
                    arbitrary sign" default intensity framework for modeling 
                    Wrong/Right-Way Risk and credit rating transitions (credit 
                    triggers) for large derivative portfolios with thousands of 
                    counterparties with or without collateral agreements. We will 
                    look at some calibration examples of this model, following 
                    a procedure based on a Volterra integral equation for the 
                    hitting time distributions. We will develop a sufficiently 
                    general Monte Carlo simulation algorithm for model calibration 
                    based on the idea of sequential fitting the drift to a term 
                    structure of CDS spreads. Finally, I will describe a new approach 
                    to Portfolio CCR and bilateral CVA calculations we call the 
                    "Gamma-Factor Copula". 
                 | 
               
               
                Wed. January 25, 2012 
                  5:00 p.m. 
                 | 
                 
                   Bruno Dupire, Head of Quantitative Research, Bloomberg 
                     
                    Functional Ito Calculus and Risk Management 
                    We introduce the Functional Ito Calculus, which gives 
                    a natural setting for defining the Greeks for path dependent 
                    options and gives a generalized PDE for the price of path 
                    dependent options, even in the case of non Markov dynamics. 
                    It leads to a variational calculus on volatility surfaces 
                    and a fine decomposition of the volatility risk as well to 
                    links with super-replication strategies. We examine a few 
                    practical examples and analyze the ability to hedge (or not) 
                    some popular structures. 
                   
                    
                 | 
               
               
                Wed. Nov 16, 2011 
                  5:00 p.m. 
                 | 
                 
                   Peter Carr, Morgan Stanley 
                     
                    Optionality and Volatility 
                    We propose two new concepts in option pricing called optionality 
                    and money vol. We provide financial interpetations of each 
                    in the context of various models.  
                    We show how money vol can be used to generate dynamics for 
                    the underlying which is consistent with a given smile.  
                   
                  ================= 
                    Alexander Lipton, Bank of America 
                     
                    Filling the Gaps 
                    The calibration of local volatility models to market data 
                    is one of the most fundamental problems of financial engineering. 
                    Under the restrictive assumption that the entire implied volatility 
                    surface is known, this problem can be solved by virtue of 
                    the so-called Dupire equation. In reality, however, the number 
                    of available data points is very limited and construction 
                    of a non-arbitrageable implied volatility surface is difficult, 
                    if not impossible, since it requires both interpolation and 
                    extrapolation of the market data. Thus, it is more natural 
                    to build the local volatility surface directly. In this talk 
                    we present a generic semi-analytical approach to calibrating 
                    a parametric local volatility surface to the market data in 
                    the realistic case when this data is sparse. This approach 
                    also allows one to build a non-arbitrageable implied volatility 
                    surface. The power of the method is illustrated by considering 
                    layered local volatility and generating local and implied 
                    volatility surfaces for options on SX5E. 
                    This is a joint work with Artur Sepp. 
                   
                    
                 | 
               
               
                |  
                   Wed. October 26, 2011 
                    5:00 p.m. 
                   
                 | 
                 
                   Matheus Grasselli , McMaster University  
                     
                    A dynamical systems model for credit expansion, asset price 
                    bubbles and financial fragility 
                    Hyman Minsky's main contribution to economics - the financial 
                    instability hypothesis - links the expansion of credit to 
                    fund new investment to the increase in asset prices and the 
                    inherent fragility of an over-leveraged financial system. 
                    In this talk I describe an attempt to mathematize his model. 
                    I start by reviewing the main properties of the Goodwin model 
                    for employment and wages - a simple two-dimensional ODE system 
                    with globally stable cycles. I then describe the extension 
                    of this model proposed by Steve Keen to incorporate financing 
                    through a banking system. This three-dimensional system exhibits 
                    both a good equilibrium with a finite level of debt and a 
                    bad one where debt grows without bounds. I analyze the stability 
                    properties of this system, in particular with respect to interest 
                    rates. A further extension connects this system to asset prices 
                    and shows the destabilizing effect of Ponzi financing, that 
                    is, the purchase of assets with borrowed money for purely 
                    speculative purposes. In the final part of the talk I describe 
                    the stabilizing effects of countercyclical government spending 
                    and capital requirements.  
                  
                  ================= 
                    Bill Janeway, Senior Research Associate, Centre for Financial 
                    Analysis and Policy, University of Cambridge and Senior Advisor, 
                    Warburg Pincus 
                     
                    Tolerating Waste in the Innovation Economy or Putting 
                    the 'Creative' in Creative Destruction 
                    Over 250 years, economic development has been driven by waves 
                    of transformational technology. This talk explores the three 
                    phases of the Innovation Economy: (1) "upstream" 
                    discovery and invention; (2) deployment of networked infrastructure; 
                    and (3) "downstream" exploration of the new economic 
                    space thereby created. Since the first and third phases are 
                    necessarily implemented through repeated exercises in trial 
                    and error, "Schumpeterian Waste" is inherent in 
                    the process. Further, while deployment of new infrastructure 
                    may be efficiently planned and executed, it has often been 
                    characterized by redundant and unremunerative projects, whether 
                    undertaken by the private or the public sectors. Thus, the 
                    process of innovation is critically dependent upon sources 
                    of funding relatively unconcerned with visible economic return.The 
                    two principle sources of funding for the upstream phase of 
                    discovery and invention have been the rents earned by monopoly 
                    corporations and state programs of non-economic investment, 
                    often motivated by issues of national security. The downstream 
                    phase of economic exploration has repeatedly been financed 
                    through speculative bubbles in the financial markets. From 
                    the canal and railway manias of the first and second industrial 
                    revolutions through electrification and the internet in the 
                    twentieth century, infrastructure investments have also been 
                    funded by financial speculation. While transformational innovation 
                    on the supply side of the economy transcends the normative 
                    goal of efficient resource allocation, too great a concern 
                    with efficient resource allocation can also encourage toleration 
                    of macroeconomic waste: unemployed human and physical resources. 
                    In turn, toleration of such "Keynesian Waste" can 
                    feed back to inhibit development of the Innovation Economy. 
                     
                   
                 | 
               
               
                |  
                   Wed. Sept. 28, 2011 
                    5:00 p.m. 
                   
                 | 
                 
                   Vadim Linetsky, McCormick School of Engineering and 
                    Applied Sciences, Northwestern University  
                  Unified Credit-Equity Modeling: From Single-Name to Multi-Name 
                    This talk surveys our work on unified credit-equity models 
                    that view the stock price as the fundamental observable state 
                    variable that jumps to zero in the event of the firm's default 
                    on its debt and treat both credit derivatives and equity derivatives 
                    in a unified fashion as contingent claims on the defaultable 
                    stock price process. After surveying single-name models, we 
                    present 
                    multi-name unified credit equity model.  
                    
                 | 
               
             
   
   
     
        
       
         
          back to top 
             
         
       
     
   
    
 | 
  |