|
MathEd Forum |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
December 26, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
MathEd ForumMEETING MINUTES/AGENDA October 24,2009Fields Math Ed Forum Meeting
|
11:3012:30 | Lunch and registration |
12:30 | Welcoming remarks [Steven Franklin, President and Vice-Chancellor, Trent] |
12:35 | Reports: OAME, OMCA, CMS, CMESG, etc. |
12:40 | The Stability & Resilience of Math Teacher Efficacy [John Ross (OISE/U of T)] |
1:05 | Count Me In! and Count Me In, Too! [Brenda Smith-Chant, Trent] |
2:05 | Teacher Learning: A school-based approach to investigating effective mathematics instruction [John Ford, Kawartha Pine Ridge DSB] |
2:30 | Coffee break & campus tour |
3:00 | Exploring the professional learning of novice teachers [Paul Betts, U Winnipeg] |
3:25 | Discussant [John Ross] |
3:40 | Open discussion |
4:00 | Adjournment |
Abstracts
John Ross (OISE, University of Toronto)
Title: The Stability & Resilience of Math Teacher Efficacy
Teacher Efficacy, the extent to which a teacher believes that he
or she is able to bring about student learning in a particular subject
like mathematics, has been the focus of extensive investigation.
Researchers have consistently found that teachers with high confidence
in their ability to teach mathematics set higher goals for themselves
and their students and persist through obstacles, generating higher
achievement than teachers with lower confidence in their teaching
ability. Teacher efficacy develops early in a teaching career and
tends to be highly stable. Such stability is usually expressed in
the gloomy tones of impervious to intervention. Few studies have
investigated resilience--the positive side of stability. I will
illustrate resilience by recounting a case study of how curriculum
disruption affected highly capable math teachers, the impact on
their beliefs about their professional competence, and the resurgence
of teacher efficacy as teachers developed new instructional strategies
to cope with the new curriculum.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Brenda Smith-Chant (Psychology, Trent University)
Title: Count Me In! and Count Me In, Too!
What a child knows about mathematics early in learning predicts
later mathematics attainment. I review data collected in the Count
Me In! and Count Me In, Too! studies on Canadian children and the
early learning factors associated with later success.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
John Ford (Kawartha Pine Ridge DSB)
Title: Teacher Learning: A school-based approach to investigating
effective mathematics instruction
In a two-year lesson study initiative, teachers, administrators
and researchers worked together to focus teachers on investigating
effective and innovative uses of interactive whiteboards combined
with manipulatives use to teach challenging concepts. The secondary
teachers expanded their team to include intermediate teachers in
year two of the study to further increase teacher collaboration
and understanding of key concepts and related learning sequences.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Betts (University of Winnipeg)
Title: Exploring the professional learning of novice teachers
Lesson Study, and other collaborative approaches to teacher professional
development are gaining popularity in America, as evidence accumulates
of quality professional learning occasioned by such approaches.
In this presentation, I will consider the issue of the enculturation
of novice teachers within the normative practices of their first
school. Some evidence suggests that novice teachers take up the
practices of their school. By considering the issue from the perspective
of teacher identity, I will provide evidence that such normalization
processes are far from simple. A case from a lesson study project
suggests that the professional learning trajectory of a novice teacher
is complex and dynamic, and not always complicit with the norms
of the school.
-------------------------------------------------------------------