April 3, 2006 --4:00 p.m.
                  Latent variables, uncertainty and evidence.
                  In many areas of science, our models involve latent variables 
                  which cannot be observed. Often these variables are such that, 
                  were we able to observe, them the testing of scientific hypotheses 
                  would be straightforward. A classical example is that of Bernoulli 
                  trials (tosses of a fair coin) observed with error. While every 
                  student knows how to construct a test that the coin is fair, 
                  how should uncertainty in observation be taken into account?
                Recently, the notions of fuzzy p-values and confidence levels 
                  have been introduced into the statistics literature as a way 
                  to describe the uncertainty inherent in a randomized test. In 
                  latent variable problems, the natural definition of a fuzzy 
                  p-value is the distribution, given observed data, of that function 
                  of latent variables that would be the p-value were the latent 
                  variables observed. This notion puts our uncertainty directly 
                  onto the p-value scale, and permits simultaneous expression 
                  of the strength of the evidence and our uncertainty.
                Several simple examples that show both the flexibility and 
                  the usefulness of the approach will be discussed. These examples 
                  require no more than knowledge of the binomial distribution 
                  and the classical p-value, yet are sufficient to show how the 
                  approach provides a new approach to uncertainty in broad areas 
                  of scientific inference.
                
                April 4, 2006 --4:00 p.m.
                  Uncertainty in inheritance and the detection of genetic linkage
                  It has long been recognized that genetic analysis would 
                  be simple if we could observe directly the inheritance of genome 
                  from parents to offspring. However, in human genetic analyses, 
                  this inheritance is often uncertain, even at highly polymorphic 
                  and well sampled genome positions. While Monte Carlo methods 
                  in general, and Markov chain Monte Carlo in particular, permit 
                  imputation of latent variables of scientific interest, simple 
                  integration over imputations loses information regarding our 
                  uncertainty.
                As discussed in the first lecture, fuzzy p-values describe 
                  the uncertainty inherent in a randomized test. Using this idea, 
                  and taking as our latent variables the unobservable patterns 
                  of inheritance in pedigrees, we apply this idea to show how 
                  fuzzy p-values can summarize both the strength of evidence for 
                  linkage and the uncertainty about that evidence. The approach 
                  also provides a solution to the long-standing problem of providing 
                  a global significance level for the multiple dependent tests 
                  performed in testing for linkage.
                We show how realizations from the fuzzy p-value distribution 
                  may be obtained efficiently with only two sets of Monte Carlo 
                  realizations, one from the unconditional distribution of latent 
                  inheritance patterns, and the other conditional on observed 
                  marker data. No resimulation of marker data is required, and 
                  the procedure, being conditional of the observed marker data, 
                  shares with permutation-based tests a partial robustness to 
                  the genetic map and assumed allele frequencies of the markers.
                
                Elizabeth Thompson received a B.A. in Mathematics (1970), a 
                  Diploma in Mathematical Statistics (1971), and Ph.D. in Statistics 
                  (1974), from Cambridge University, UK. In 1974-5 she was a NATO/SRC 
                  postdoc in the Department of Genetics, Stanford University. 
                  From 1975-81 she was a Fellow of King's College, Cambridge, 
                  and from 1981-5 was Fellow and Director of Studies in Mathematics 
                  at Newnham College. From 1976-1985 she was a University Lecturer 
                  in the Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, 
                  University of Cambridge. She joined the faculty of the University 
                  of Washington in December 1985, as a Professor of Statistics.
                From 1988 to 2004, Dr. Thompson was also Professor of Biostatistics. 
                  Since Spring 2000, she has been an Adjunct Professor in Genetics 
                  (now Genome Sciences) at the University of Washington, and an 
                  Adjunct Professor of Statistics at North Carolina State University. 
                
                At the University of Washington, Dr. Thompson was Chair of 
                  the Department of Statistics from 1989-94, and was Graduate 
                  Program Coordinator in Statistics, 1995-8, and 1999-2000. From 
                  1990 to 2002 she was a member of the QERM Interdisciplinary 
                  Graduate Program faculty, and served as the alternate QERM Graduate 
                  Program Coordinator for 1998-9. From 1999-2002 she was also 
                  a member of the interdisciplinary faculty group in Computational 
                  Molecular Biology, but since 1999 has focussed primarily on 
                  the development of research and education in Statistical Genetics 
                  at the University of Washington .