| Upcoming Seminars: 
        every Tuesday and Thursday at 2:00 pm Room 210 | 
    
     
      |   | 
      TBA | 
    
     
      | Past Seminars | 
    
     
      | May 21 | 
       
         James Lutley 
          Nuclear Dimension and the Toeplitz Algebra 
         
          After reviewing classical Toeplitz matrices, we will briefly review 
            the CPC approximation used on the Cuntz-Toeplitz algebras by Winter 
            and Zacharias to study the Cuntz algebras. We will then show in full 
            detail how these maps operate on the Toeplitz algebra itself. This 
            calculation fails to determine the nuclear dimension of the Toeplitz 
            algebra itself but we will show how these techniques can be extended 
            to put this within reach.  
           
         
       | 
    
     
      | May 14 | 
       
         Dave Penneys 
          Computing principal graphs part 2 
         
         
          Last week we looked at the Jones tower, the relative commutants, 
            and the principal graph for some subfactors associated to finite groups. 
            This week, we'll continue our analysis of the relative commutants 
            and the principal. We will show how minimal projections in the relative 
            commutants correspond to bimodules, and we'll discuss how we view 
            the principal graph as the fusion graph associated to these bimodules, 
            where fusion refers to Connes fusion of bimodules. We'll then compute 
            a particular example of importance in the classification of subfactors 
            at index 3+\sqrt{5}. 
           
         
       | 
    
     
      | May 9 | 
       
         Dave Penneys 
          Computing principal graphs 
         
          Subfactors are classified by their standard invariants, and standard 
            invariants are classified by their principal graphs. I will give the 
            appropriate definitions, and then I will compute some principal graphs. 
            In particular, we will look at examples coming from groups and examples 
            coming from compositions of subfactors. 
             
           
         
       | 
    
     
      | May 7 | 
      David Kerr 
        Turbulence in automorphism groups of C*-algebras  | 
    
     
      | Apr. 30 | 
       Nicola Watson 
        Connes's Classification of Injective Factors | 
    
     
      | Apr. 11 | 
      Greg Maloney | 
    
     
      | Apr. 9 | 
      Danny Hay | 
    
     
      | Apr. 4 | 
       
         Nicola Watson 
       | 
    
     
      | Mar. 28 | 
      Luis Santiago 
        The $Cu^\sim$-semigroup of a C*-algebra  | 
    
     
      | Mar. 26 | 
       
         Dave Penneys 
          GJS C*-algebras 
         
          Guionnet-Jones-Shlyakhtenko (GJS) gave a diagrammatic proof of a 
            result of Popa which reconstructs a subfactor from a subfactor planar 
            algebra. In the process, certain canonical graded *-algebras with 
            traces appear. In the GJS papers, they show that the von Neumann algebras 
            generated by the graded algebras are interpolated free group factors. 
            In ongoing joint work with Hartglass, we look at the C * -algebras 
            generated by the graded algebras. We are interested in a connection 
            between subfactors and non-commutative geometry, and the first step 
            in this process is to compute the K-theory of these C * -algebras. 
            I will talk about the current state of our work.  
             
           
         
       | 
    
     
      | Mar. 21 | 
       
         Makoto Yamashita 
          Deformation of algebras from group 2-cocycles  
         
          Algebras with graded by a discrete can be deformed using 2-cocycles 
            on the base group. We give a K-theoretic isomorphism of such deformations, 
            generalizing the previously known cases of the theta-deformations 
            and the reduced twisted group algebras. When we perturb the deformation 
            parameter, the monodromy of the Gauss-Manin connection can be identified 
            with the action of the group cohomology.  
             
           
         
       | 
    
     
      | Jan. 17 | 
       
         Zhiqiang Li 
          Certain group actions on C*-algebras 
         
           We will discuss group actions of certain groups, mainly, discrete 
            groups, for example, \mathbb{Z}^d, and finite groups, then look at 
            several classifiable classes of such group actions, and finally we 
            will give a classification of inductive limit actions of  
            cyclic groups with prime orders on approximate finite dimensional 
            C*- algebras. 
           
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Jan. 15  
       | 
       
         Ask Anything Seminar  
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Jan 10 
       | 
       
           George Elliott 
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Dec 20 
       | 
       
           Nadish de Silva 
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Dec 18 
       | 
       
           James Lutley 
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Dec 13 
       | 
       
          Dave Penneys 
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Dec 11 
       | 
       
          George Elliott 
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Dec 6 
         
       | 
       
          Greg Maloney 
          A constructive approach to ultrasimplicial groups 
         
          I will review the result of Riedel that says that every simple finitely 
            generated dimension group with a unique state is ultrasimplicial. 
            The proof involves explicitly constructing a sequence of positive 
            integer matrices using a multidimensional continued fraction algorithm. 
            This approach is similar to that used by Elliott  
            and by Effros and Shen in their earlier results. 
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Dec 4 
         
       | 
       
          Danny Hay 
          Computing the decomposition rank of Z-stable AH algebras 
         
          We will take a look at a recent paper of Tikuisis and Winter, in 
            which it is shown that the decomposition rank of Z-stable AH algebras 
            is at most 2. The result is important not only because establishing 
            finite decomposition rank is significant for the classification program, 
            but also because the computation is direct  
            previous results of this type generally factor through classification 
            theorems, and so shed no light on why finite dimensionality occurs. 
             
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Nov 27 
         
       | 
       
         
           Zhiqiang Li (U of Toronto; Fields) 
            Finite group action on C*-algebra  
             
            I am going to talk about some result of M. Izumi on finite group action 
            on C*-algebras. Mainy, there is a cohomology obstruction for C*-algebra 
            having finite group action with Rokhlin property. 
           
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Nov 29 
         
       | 
       
          Mike Hartglass (Berkley) 
          Rigid $C^{*}$ tensor categories of bimodules over interpolated 
          free group factors  
         
          The notion of a fantastic (or factor) planar algebra will be presented 
            and some examples will be given. I will then show how such an object 
            can be used to diagrammatically describe a rigid, countably generated 
            $C^{*}$ tensor category $\mathcal{C}$. Following in the steps of Guionnet, 
            Jones, and Shlyakhtenko, I will present a diagrammatic construction 
            of a $II_{1}$ factor $M$ and a category of bimodules over $M$ which 
            is equivalent to $\mathcal{C}$. Finally, I will show that the factor 
            $M$ is an interpolated free group factor and can always be made to 
            be isomorphic to $L(\mathbb{F}_{\infty})$. Therefore we will deduce 
            that every rigid, countably generated $C^{*}$ tensor category is equivalent 
            to a category of bimodules over $L(\mathbb{F}_{\infty})$.  
             
            This is joint work with Arnaud Brothier and David Penneys. 
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Nov 22 
         
       | 
       
         Paul McKenney (Carnegie Mellon) 
          Approximate *-homomorphisms 
         
          Abstract: I will discuss various notions of "approximate  
            homomorphism", and show some averaging techniques that have been 
            used  
            to produce an actual homomorphism near a given approximate homomorphism. 
           
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Nov 20 
         
       | 
       
         Brent Brenken (Univeristy of Calgary) 
          Universal C*-algebras of *-semigroups and the C*-algebra of a 
          partial isometry 
         
          Certain universal C*-algebras for *-semigroups will be introduced. 
            Some basic examples, and ones that occur in describing the C*-algebra 
            of a partial isometry, will be discussed. The latter is a Cuntz- Pimsner 
            C*-algebra associated with a C*-correspondence, and can be viewed 
            as a form of crossed product C*-algebra for an action by a completely 
            positive map. The C*-algebras involved occur as universal C*-algebras 
            associated with contractive *-representations, and complete order 
            *-representations, of certain *-semigroups. 
           
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Nov 13 
         
       | 
       
         Nicola Watson (U of Toronto) 
          Noncommutative covering dimension 
         
          There have been many fruitful attempts to define noncommutative versions 
            of the covering dimension of a topological space, ranging from the 
            stable and real ranks to the decomposition rank. In 2010, Winter and 
            Zacharias defined the nuclear dimension of a C*-algebra, which has 
            turned out to be a major development in the study of nuclear C*-algebras. 
            In this talk, we introduce nuclear dimension, discuss the differences 
            between it and other dimension theories, and focus on why  
            nuclear dimension is so important. 
         
        (This is a practice for a talk I'm giving at Penn State, so it will 
          be more formal than usual.) 
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Nov 8 
         
       | 
       
          Danny Hay 
           
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Nov 6 
         
       | 
       
          Greg Maloney 
          Connes' fusion 
         
          I'll give a basic introduction to Connes' fusion for bimodules over 
            finite von Neumann algebras.  
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Nov 6,8,13,15 
         
       | 
       
         Working seminars 
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Octr 30 and Nov 1 
         
       | 
      "Wiki Week" 
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Oct 25 
         
       | 
      Dave Penneys (U of Toronto) 
        Infinite index subfactors and the GICAR algebra  
         
          We will show how the GICAR algebra is the analog of the Temperley-Lieb 
            algebra for infinite index subfactors. As a corollary, we will see 
            that the centralizer algebra M_0'\cap M_{2n} is nonabelian for all 
            n\geq 2. 
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Oct 18 
         
       | 
      Greg Maloney  
        Ultrasimplicial groups  
         
          An ordered abelian group is called a dimension group if it is the 
            inductive limit of a sequence of direct sums of copies of Z. Dimension 
            groups are of interest in the study of operator algebras because they 
            are the K0-groups of AF C*-algebras. 
             
            If, in addition, a dimension group admits such an inductive limit 
            representation in which the maps are injective, then it is called 
            an ultrasimplicial group. The question then arises: exactly which 
            dimension groups are ultrasimplicial? 
             
            There have been positive and negative results on this subject. Elliott 
            showed that every totally ordered (countable) group is ultrasimplicial, 
            and Riedel showed that a free simple dimension group of finite rank 
            with a unique state is ultrasimplicial. Much later, Marra showed that 
            every lattice ordered abelian group is ultrasimplicial. On the other 
            hand, Elliott produced an example of a simple dimension group that 
            is not ultrasimplicial, and later Riedel produced a collection of 
            simple free dimension groups that are not ultrasimplicial. I will 
            discuss the history of this subject and go through some calculations 
            in detail. 
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Oct 16 
         
       | 
      Martino Lupini (York) 
        The complexity of the relation of unitary equivalence for automorphisms 
        of separable unital C*-algebras  
         
          A classical result of Glimm from 1961 asserts that the irreducible 
            representations of a given separable C*-algebra A are classifiable 
            by real numbers up to unitary equivalence if and only if A is type 
            I. In 2008, Kerr-Li-Pichot and, independently, Farah proved that when 
            A is not type I, then the irreducible representations are not even 
            classifiable by countable structures. I will show that a similar dichotomy 
            holds for classification of automorphisms up to unitary equivalence. 
            Namely, the automorphisms of a given separable unital C*- algebra 
            A are classifiable by real numbers if and only if A has continuous 
            trace, and not even classifiable by countable structures otherwise. 
           
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
          Oct 11 
         
       | 
      Xin Li (University of Muenster) 
        Semigroup C*-algebras  
         
          The goal of the talk is to give an overview of recent results about 
            semigroup C*-algebras. We discuss amenability, both in the semigroup 
            and C*-algebraic context, and explain how to compute K-theory for 
            semigroup C*-algebras. 
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Oct 4 
         
       | 
       
         Zhi Qiang Li (U of Toronto; Fields)  
          Finite group action on C*-algebra 
         
          I am going to talk about some result of M. Izumi on finite group 
            action on C*-algerbras. Mainy, there is a cohomology obstruction for 
            C*-algebra having finite group action with Rokhlin property. 
         
       | 
    
     
      |  
         Sept. 18 
       | 
       
         Aaron Tikuisis 
          Regularity for stably projectionless C*-algebras 
         
          There has been significant success recently in proving that unital 
            simple C*-algebras are Z-stable, under other regularity hypotheses. 
            With certain new techniques (particularly concerning traces and algebraic 
            simplicity), many of these results can be generalized to the nonunital 
            setting. In particular, it can be shown that the following C*-algebras 
            are Z-stable: (i) (nonunital) ASH algebras with slow dimension growth 
            (T-Toms); (ii) (nonunital) C*-algebras with finite nuclear dimension 
            (T); and (iii) (nonunital) C*-algebras with strict comparison and 
            finitely many extreme traces (Nawata). I will discuss the proofs of 
            these results, with emphasis on the innovations required for the nonunital 
            setting. 
         
       |