|  
                     
                    
                 | 
                 
                  The Ubiquity of Analogy in Mathematical 
                    Thought
                   Mathematicians generally like to present their work in the 
                    wraps of extreme rigor and pure logic. This professional posture 
                    is in some ways very admirable. However, where do their ideas 
                    really come from? Might mathematicians be cut from a different 
                    cloth than ordinary humans, or could that be the case at least 
                    temporarily, whenever they do their professional work? Could 
                    it be that mathematicians, just before sitting down to do 
                    their work, don blur-suppression helmets or anti-intuition 
                    caps, in somewhat the same way passengers in cars fasten their 
                    seatbelts? Do they then strictly follow the straight-and-narrow 
                    pathways of pure, rigorous, logical axiomatic deduction in 
                    order to reach their often astonishing conclusions? 
                   No. 
                   This talk will be about how deeply and universally mathematical 
                    thought at all levels of sophistication is riddled with impure, 
                    nonrigorous, illogical intuitions originating in analogies, 
                    often highly unconscious ones. Some of these analogies are 
                    good and some of them are bad, but good or bad, it is they 
                    that lurk behind the scenes of all mathematical thought. And 
                    far from being a disappointment, it is a source of joy to 
                    recognize and savor the swarm of analogies that lurk behind 
                    the scenes. 
                   What is curious, to my mind, is that so few mathematicians 
                    seem to take pleasure in examining and exploring this crucial 
                    and wonderful aspect of their minds, their thoughts, and their 
                    deep discoveries. Perhaps, however, they can be stimulated 
                    to examine their own hidden thinking processes if the ubiquity 
                    of analogies can be made sufficiently vivid as to grab their 
                    interest. So in this talk, I will do my best to provoke mathematicians. 
                    At the same time, I will try equally hard to convey to non-mathematicians 
                    the sheer joy of mathematical thinking, of mathematical invention, 
                    of mathematical discovery, of mathematical revelation. 
                   To convey this intense type of joy, I will conclude the 
                    talk with some highly personal tales of analogical invention/discovery 
                    in mathematics, because I still recall the profound and heady 
                    exhilaration they gave me over 50 years ago so vividly that 
                    it all might as well have happened just yesterday. 
                   
                 | 
              
               
                 
                   
                  Douglas Richard Hofstadter is an American professor of cognitive 
                  science whose research focuses on the sense of "I",consciousness, 
                  analogy-making, artistic creation, literary translation, and 
                  discovery in mathematics and physics. He is best known for his 
                  book Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid, first 
                  published in 1979. It won both the Pulitzer Prize for general 
                  non-fiction and a National Book Award (at that time called The 
                  American Book Award) for Science. His 2007 book I Am a Strange 
                  Loop won the Los Angeles Times Book Prize for Science and Technology. |