Research 
            projects are vetted through a two-stage process that involves a proposal 
            for an inaugural workshop followed by a full proposal for a 
            national project. In the inaugural workshop, scientific partners engage 
            in extensive discussions of analytic and scientific problems in challenging 
            research areas, discourse that leads to a greater understanding of 
            needs and subsequent evolution of the full proposal. While this cautious 
            approach implies a longer lead-in time for establishing a project, 
            in practice it has proven to be highly successful for discussing collaborative 
            research opportunities in thematic areas, fostering contacts with 
            government and industry, identifying problems for graduate student 
            involvement, in bringing students in contact with industry and agencies, 
            and showcasing the project to attract international partnerships. 
            The Scientific Director works closely with project leaders on the 
            nature of the collaboration, the training of HQP, and the scientific 
            activities of the project, thereby ensuring that full proposals address 
            the institute's goals and criteria for evaluation. NICDS criteria 
            for projects proposals may be found here. A proposal template 
            may be found here.
          Calls 
            for inaugural workshop proposals are a regular event. The proposals 
            are vetted rigorously by the SAC for their potential to generate a 
            national project that fulfills the NICDS criteria. Workshops are expected 
            to substantially involve students as attendees or presenters. Successful 
            workshop proposal applicants are expected to obtain matching funds 
            from governmental or industrial partners. A sample call for proposals 
            may be found here. A proposal template 
            may be found here.
          Adjudication 
            of full proposals by the SAC involves 
            at least three anonymous, often international, referees. The four-month 
            process provides applicants with referee reports, and the SAC prepares 
            a detailed report, with its recommendation, for consideration by the 
            Board. In the case of a positive result, the Board communicates directly 
            with the Principal Investigator to discuss project implementation 
            and to suggest new research and industrial partners. 
          The 
            NICDS has also issued calls for proposals for intensive training events. 
            A sample call for proposals may be found 
            here. A proposal template may be found 
            here.